window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag() { dataLayer.push(arguments); } // Set default consent BEFORE any tags load gtag('consent', 'default', { 'ad_storage': 'denied', 'ad_user_data': 'denied', 'ad_personalization': 'denied', 'analytics_storage': 'denied', 'wait_for_update': 500 }); // Configure cross-domain tracking for all relevant domains gtag('set', 'linker', { 'domains': [ 'carlsonforensics.com', 'www.carlsonforensics.com', 'lovable.app' ], 'accept_incoming': true });

Social Media Evidence in Psychiatric Damages Evaluations

Stephan M. Carlson, MD, MBA, FAPA · Civil Psychiatric IME

A photograph of a plaintiff smiling on vacation does not disprove major depression. A week of silence on social media does not prove psychiatric impairment. Social media can help or distort a psychiatric damages evaluation depending on how carefully the evaluator reasons from a curated record. What social media can establish Social media may show activity, travel, social contact, work, hobbies, physical activity, communication ability, or inconsistencies with claimed limitations. In a psychiatric damages case, that may be relevant to function. But a feed is not a mental status examination. People with serious depression can smile for a photograph. People with PTSD can attend a social event.

Most relevant service: Civil Litigation IME & Damages Causation

Forensic Psychiatry Legal Updates (Newsletter)

Attorneys can subscribe by email for monthly case-law and forensic-evaluation updates.

Email-only sign-up. Do not submit confidential case details or PHI. Subscribing does not create a doctor-patient, attorney-client, or expert-witness relationship.