window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag() { dataLayer.push(arguments); } // Set default consent BEFORE any tags load gtag('consent', 'default', { 'ad_storage': 'denied', 'ad_user_data': 'denied', 'ad_personalization': 'denied', 'analytics_storage': 'denied', 'wait_for_update': 500 }); // Configure cross-domain tracking for all relevant domains gtag('set', 'linker', { 'domains': [ 'carlsonforensics.com', 'www.carlsonforensics.com', 'lovable.app' ], 'accept_incoming': true });

Workplace Threat Assessment After Concerning Messages

Stephan M. Carlson, MD, MBA, FAPA · Employment and Fitness

Short answer: a workplace threat assessment evaluates context, capability, and trajectory after concerning communications. It is distinct from a fitness for duty evaluation and cannot predict individual acts of violence. An employee sends a message that reads as menacing, and counsel asks a deceptively simple question: is this person dangerous? A defensible threat assessment answers a narrower one—what the communication, read against this employee's history and context, says about the likelihood of targeted violence—and stays candid about how provisional that estimate is. What a concerning communication does and does not establish A single email, text, or post is data, not a diagnosis and no

Most relevant service: Expert Witness IME

Forensic Psychiatry Legal Updates (Newsletter)

Attorneys can subscribe by email for monthly case-law and forensic-evaluation updates.

Email-only sign-up. Do not submit confidential case details or PHI. Subscribing does not create a doctor-patient, attorney-client, or expert-witness relationship.