Workplace Threat Assessment After Concerning Messages
Stephan M. Carlson, MD, MBA, FAPA · Employment and Fitness
Short answer: a workplace threat assessment evaluates context, capability, and trajectory after concerning communications. It is distinct from a fitness for duty evaluation and cannot predict individual acts of violence. An employee sends a message that reads as menacing, and counsel asks a deceptively simple question: is this person dangerous? A defensible threat assessment answers a narrower one—what the communication, read against this employee's history and context, says about the likelihood of targeted violence—and stays candid about how provisional that estimate is. What a concerning communication does and does not establish A single email, text, or post is data, not a diagnosis and no
Most relevant service: Expert Witness IME
Forensic Psychiatry Legal Updates (Newsletter)
Attorneys can subscribe by email for monthly case-law and forensic-evaluation updates.
Email-only sign-up. Do not submit confidential case details or PHI. Subscribing does not create a doctor-patient, attorney-client, or expert-witness relationship.