Violence Risk and Fitness for Duty Are Not the Same Question
Stephan M. Carlson, MD, MBA, FAPA · Employment and Fitness
A fitness-for-duty referral and a violence risk referral feel adjacent, so they are routinely collapsed into one report. They are not the same question, and an opinion that answers both at once usually answers neither well. Two questions that travel together but diverge Fitness for duty asks a present-capacity question: can this employee, right now, perform the essential functions of a defined job, with or without reasonable accommodation, without posing a direct threat? Violence risk asks a probabilistic question: over some future window, what is the likelihood this person engages in harmful conduct, and what conditions raise or lower it? One is anchored to a specific job and a specific mom
Most relevant service: Expert Witness IME
Forensic Psychiatry Legal Updates (Newsletter)
Attorneys can subscribe by email for monthly case-law and forensic-evaluation updates.
Email-only sign-up. Do not submit confidential case details or PHI. Subscribing does not create a doctor-patient, attorney-client, or expert-witness relationship.