window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag() { dataLayer.push(arguments); } // Set default consent BEFORE any tags load gtag('consent', 'default', { 'ad_storage': 'denied', 'ad_user_data': 'denied', 'ad_personalization': 'denied', 'analytics_storage': 'denied', 'wait_for_update': 500 }); // Configure cross-domain tracking for all relevant domains gtag('set', 'linker', { 'domains': [ 'carlsonforensics.com', 'www.carlsonforensics.com', 'lovable.app' ], 'accept_incoming': true });

False Precision in New York Violence Risk Testimony

Stephan M. Carlson, MD, MBA, FAPA · Violence and Threat Risk

A violence risk instrument sorts a person into a group and reports how often, over a defined window, people in that group were later violent. The witness who converts that group rate into "this individual is 87% likely to reoffend" has not added precision—he has invented it, and the invention is usually where the opinion breaks. What a risk instrument actually produces Most structured violence risk tools fall into two families, and neither delivers an individualized probability. Actuarial instruments place a subject into a risk bin and report the recidivism rate for the validation sample in that bin—a group frequency, bounded by wide confidence intervals at the individual level. Structured p

Most relevant service: Violence & Threat Risk Assessment

Forensic Psychiatry Legal Updates (Newsletter)

Attorneys can subscribe by email for monthly case-law and forensic-evaluation updates.

Email-only sign-up. Do not submit confidential case details or PHI. Subscribing does not create a doctor-patient, attorney-client, or expert-witness relationship.